-
Website
http://cyclingtipsblog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/08/campy-vs-shimano-vs-sram-fight/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
GDWheeler
8 comments · 1 points
-
A_C
16 comments · 1 points
-
James Foran
13 comments · 2 points
-
toneredd
10 comments · 1 points
-
timmarsh
10 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
CT Interviews Simon Gerrans!
1 day ago · 41 comments
-
Last Km’s Of 2009!
3 days ago · 36 comments
-
Finding The Right Saddle
1 week ago · 37 comments
-
Bunch Riding Etiquette – TT Bars Allowed?
2 weeks ago · 59 comments
-
Glenvale Helmet Cam!
1 week ago · 37 comments
-
CT Interviews Simon Gerrans!
Shimano all the way!
Shimano invented indexed shifting and it took Campy 7 years to catch up. The biggest Campy innovation ever has been adding an extra gear in their 11 speed.
Shimano now has the Di2 electronic shifting. How long will it take Campy to respond to that?
The first electronic components were developed by Mavic and ridden in the 1992 Tour de France by the ONCE and RMO teams. Called the Zap Mavic System (ZMS), it launched publicly the following year allowing riders to adjust the rear derailleur using two small buttons mounted to a specially designed handlebar that also housed the battery system.
The following year Campagnolo started testing a similar system - the difference being that instead of relying on electromagnets to maneuver the derailleur, Campagnolo used a small actuator motor. This design was patented in Italy in 1994 and worldwide in 1996.
Both companies continued to refine their designs until 1999 when Mavic released their Mektronic system - the first 'wireless' system which integrated the computer, shifters and rear derailleur in a wire-free electronic system.
Campagnolo went one better later that year, releasing details of their first ever fully electronic groupset with both derailleurs being cable free and capable of both up and down shifts. The design was patented in early 1999 and first sighted in the pro peloton in late 2001 / early 2002.
"Shimano invented indexed shifting and it took Campy 7 years to catch up. The biggest Campy innovation ever has been adding an extra gear in their 11 speed."
In 1999 Campagnolo released carbon ergo levers as part of their Record groupset.
In 2001 both the Record and Chorus groupsets came standard with carbon ergo levers.
In 2004 both the Record and Chorus groupsets came with a carbon crankset.
In late 2008 Shimano released their first hybrid carbon crankset (aluminum core wrapped in carbon).
In 2009 Shimano released their first Dura Ace groupset with STI levers manufactured with carbon fiber instead of forged aluminum.
..but using new materials doesnt really mean "innovation". shift faster?better? --Campy is behind the other 2, IMHO.
Since then, however I'd have to say Shimano has been more innovative. SRAM is going to push them both but I fear that will mean a pissing match over how many gears (11? really?) and gizmos that are harbingers of the robot uprising (Di2). God help neutral servce!
Truth be told- having used both Campy and Shimano previously I have found that in 3 years of riding and racing on SRAM Force I've had to adjust the grouppo but a few times, mostly when replacing cables or other heavy maintenance... that I never have to trim the derailleurs or adjust the shifting is proof positive... Plus they basically give it to us... ;)
pip
Shimano is fine, but a bit of a reach in the drops, and yet to try SRAM. Quite confident that SRAM Red will make the shortlist for my next bike.
That said - I reckon Campy is aesthetically much more appealing (and not just because of the cable-free front end), and if I can ever afford some Italian lusciousness then it would be Campy all the way....
SRAM has me interested though - if it stands the test of time reliability wise, then I'd be tempted to give ita crack in a few years when I do my next gruppo upgrade.....
Top pros change teams all the time and as a result change bikes and grupo providers - you don't hear any of them saying I can't win anymore because I don't like the new shifters. It never ceases to amaze me the amount of money people will throw at equipment changes or upgrades in the hope of going a bit faster when all they need to do is pull a few more turns in training or eat a few less donuts! It's not rocket surgery.
Make mine a SRAM Force. My last two bikes were Campy and I love my SRAM Force (Like Steffo says below "with Shimano chain & cassettes"). SRAM is like the love child of Campy mating with Shimano (Shimano is the feminine), it has the best of both brands.
Zing!
SRAM good
Ergonomics
Compatibility
Weight
Price
Gear lever throw length
Crispness
SRAM bad
Chains and cassettes
Shimano good
Electronics
Smooth light feel
Chains and cassettes
Shimano bad
excessive shift lever throw length
External cables on lower groups
General uncoolness
Sora-105
Campy good
Italian
11speed
History
Prestige
Crisp gears
Campy bad
Price
Thumb shifters
Not compatible with other groups
When i become an old man and buy my custom Ti frame it will deff have campag on it.... just for the looks.
I prefer the look and feel of Red but operating and functioning of Dura ace seems to be much better.
I've hardly ever had to make an adjustment. Works like a charm for me.
Still, I prefer the Campy front derailleur shifting, but still really like SRAM's double tap on the rear. Would be nice to mix them but I think the incongruence would do my head in!
I tried the Dura Ace Di2 last year and it was phenomenal. I'd use it in a heartbeat if I could afford it. There's a link to my thoughts on it in the article above.
Campy definitely "wears in" so will be interested to see the durability of the Red in comparison, but at this stage it looks and feels great. Love the double-tap, great trim capability on the levers, good coverage of the cassette on the big change ring, solid brakes.... will checkout the flex of the front mech described above on tomorrow's ride (hills) though??
Top post CT but would have loved this 3 weeks ago when making my recent purchase decision :) Fantastic input from passionate and real cyclists, no better spot on the web
I was actually expecting more senseless trash talk with this post but there are mostly excellent comments in here. Great to see!
Electronic gears? I dont get it. Save the planet and use your fingers.
My fave grouppo? Easy: 7700 Dura Ace.. 9 speed. Still have it running on my old Scapin. Set up in 2002 and running like the day it was set up (replaced chain and cables a couple of times). I like the fat mechanical shift and classic looks. While I don't do the kind of kays that CT does and avoid wet days, its proving the "wears out while campy wears in argument to be quite wrong".
I will still probably buy Campy again though, just for the looks and emotion of it...
Now on the topic of justification- can someone please convince me why I should buy Dura Ace over Ultegra? (talking only groupset, not wheels)
I have just invested in the new Campag 11 speed, and after 2 rides on it I am ecstatic! It shifts beautifully and the definitive clunk you feel and hear when shifting is great.
It may be a little more expensive than the others, but the simple fact that your get a FOUR YEAR WARRANTY just shows how well made the product is. And it looks great, matches the shaved legs so it shows I must be a serious rider!!!
As for Hollywood, he looks like a McDonalds Restaurant on that thing!! Maybe he's getting free Big Mac's
And if you think it'll make the difference in a race....think again and then go buy a better set of wheels or better still train harder!
Cheers and tight shifts,
David
I've got a dusty box filled with discarded shimano levers that made it through a year or two (or a crash) and are done for...
Which is NOT an actual reason given by Campagnolo press manager Francesco Zenere for his company's move to 11 speed?
--"Why not?"
--"Cyclists are never truly happy whether they are professionals or amateurs."
--"The extra cog offers smoother transitions between gears, allowing competitive riders to maintain optimal cadence in a variety of terrain."
--"The 11th speed is in fact the icing, while the cake is the remarkable makeover of the three groupsets dedicated to competition use."
See for answer:
http://velonews.com/article/77895/tech-report-t...
Awsome!
Only thing has been the cassette (I have used a KMC chain from the outset), I couldn't get it to quiet down. It wouldn't skip or anything, but just wouldn't shut up! Changed wheels and and it just happened to have an Ultegra cassette on, SILENCE!
Even without being cheaper and lighter, Force over Dura Ace for me.
Mind you, never had the pesos to Campy.
Shimano has no sole, its cold, ugly and insipid. I have never ridden Spam so I cant comment with any real conviction. I can't stand the way Sham changes.
Campagnolo is like a Porshe, smooth, fast, stylish and sexy. Shimano is like a Toyota Yaris and Spam like a Hyndui.
You cant talk and write all you want the truth is if you dont have Campagnolo you probably wish you did.
Campagnolo has been testing thier electronic group set for over 5 years and I bet it will be so far ahead of Shimano and I bet it wont have that great big ugly battery.
While Campagnolo wears in Shimano wears out and Spam falls apart.
replaced with ultegra
So when Big Mig was winning TdFs or Pantani doing a Giro/TdF double, then Shimano sucked and Campagnolo was the only pro race worthy groupset?
I am an Italian rider and I ride Campagnolo, because I think they make great components (and also because I am Italian). Having said that, even here in Italy, when people ask me what they should ride, I suggest that they try out the ergonomics of all three players in the market and choose what they are most comfortable with.
Enough balanced discussion: you have to admit that Campagnolo looks best in terms of all three groups. SRAM simply looks cheap. And Shimano, well, it is not exactly aesthetically pleasing...
I switched to Sram Red and really do love the way it works. As far as looks go, Sram has grown on me.
However, I would switch back to Campy in heart beat if they took their head out of their own ass and made the spare part prices more realistic.
I'm pretty simple, one mechanism for down and another mechanism for up - well spaced from one another, that simple logic took me there in the first place.....what is there to revolutionise about something so simple?
Push the button down, get a higher gear, accelerating out of the saddle - it couldn't be easier, I still have major purchase on the hood and it moves beautifully with each precise 'click'.
Again, fortunately the ergo hoods fit my hands.
Aesthetically, I find a carbon crank and derailleur way sexier than those big thick carbon tractor wheels - it looks like a bike should!!!!
Finally, how can you rate something that has to be bastardised in order to function properly, that's rubbish - put your hand up if you've bought a Ford only to run a Holden motor in it in order to be able to use it properly????
And when was the last time you drove a car (or anything else for that matter) with two separate shit devices? Maybe Alfa Romeo are deveoping an manual gear shift with an up-shift device operated by the driver's elbow? Sorry, I must disagree. After 10yrs on Campy, coming out of the last corner the thumb shift only ever let me 'dump a bunch of changes' (on to the 11 sprocket) whereas SRAM has a finesse that provides (me) with pin-point shifting.
And if fits my hands like a glove. After suffering Campy ergos (there aint nutin' ergo(nomical) about Campy ergos) for so long I was instantly converted to SRAM by the hoods alone. ShimaNO? Pfffft! What else can we expect from a Japanese manufacturer except to integrate joysticks into its design.
Campagnolo - if you're a poser
Shimano - if you're a non-Pro
SRAM - if you're SMART
How long ago was your instant sram conversion?
The new campy hoods are substantially different to even last years model.....and i would call one click one shift pin-point.....and still be able to dump a bunch. And the shift mechanism has also improved.
Obviously things change with development time and eventually Sram will get the chains and rings correct, won't happen over night but it will happen, until then, like someone driving a BMW or and Audi - I'll have to keep posing.
Know anyone who rides either of them......well aren't they posers, lol??
I could have gone with Ferrari but they are beyond the average reach and i'm just flat out envious of those people..........with a Ferrari comes big tits!!
Thanks CT, I think in future I'll stick to the ringside seat.
And my apologise to anyone that drives a Euro car.
The Italian design of Capagnolo may be easthetically superior to Sram's value for money. But for all round performance Shimano appears marginally ahead, though not by much.
It's a bit like debating Jesus and Allah. No one has ever agreed in over 2000 years of trying. Hopefully it never comes to millions being killed in the name of Campy. ;-)
I use RIVAL shifters and derailleurs with a DURA-ACE 7800 drive line ( crank,cassette,chain) . It works PERFECT and is light, cheap and clean. It shifts like a robot and is really quiet. I got the stiffness and silence of Dura-Ace with the cleanliness and precision of Sram.
For me it's SHIMANO and SRAM.
It's great, and I think I'm sold on it (my next winter trainer will definitely be kitted out in Rival), BUT....
Their chain/cassette combo IS noisy (when the chain needs replacing I shall be fitting a KMC chain), although the finest of adjustments of the rear mech can improve this. Although my overall experience is better than Snowy's (Comment 29), I do have to agree about the wheel swapping thing: when I change from my Zipps to my DT Swiss wheels (both have Red cassettes), I have to ratchet the rear derailleur 7 or 8 quarter turns to get it to shut up. This would obviously be less than ideal in a race situation.
Other than that, it works supremely well. The "positive feel" (or "clunkiness", as I like to think of it) took some getting used to after years of Dura Ace, but I love it now. Shifts particularly well under load.
There's my tuppence worth!
I went to the FELT bikes 2010 release last week. The new season Ultegra
is a silver version of Dura-ace. It looks, rides and feels fantastic.
Great read guy's / girl's
Good job Wade.
but then again...shimano ftw
Oh and steel bikes only.