-
Website
http://cyclingtipsblog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/03/hutchinson-fusion-2-tubless-tires/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
GDWheeler
8 comments · 1 points
-
A_C
16 comments · 1 points
-
James Foran
13 comments · 2 points
-
toneredd
10 comments · 1 points
-
timmarsh
10 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
CT Interviews Simon Gerrans!
1 day ago · 41 comments
-
Last Km’s Of 2009!
3 days ago · 36 comments
-
Finding The Right Saddle
1 week ago · 37 comments
-
Bunch Riding Etiquette – TT Bars Allowed?
2 weeks ago · 59 comments
-
Glenvale Helmet Cam!
1 week ago · 37 comments
-
CT Interviews Simon Gerrans!
I was like total rip off before reading the last line.
Good shot :)
Velodramatic is my unknowing style and design consultant. Inspiration may be a better word...
Just a note to consider this article before applying some types of sealant to a tubeless setup. http://www.velonews.com/article/89375/lennard-z...
the only thing I have on him is COBBLES! Always gives a dramatic effect
Is it stupid to consider a very light tire and the lightest sealant to hopefully reduce the weight by 100+ grams? Since this is the most efficient part of the bike to take off weight it is tempting.
How big of a mess is it when you finaly have to change out the tire, does the sealant present a gooey mess?
tks.
I haven't tried this on the Neutrons, but I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work the same as my rear Mavic Open Pro (I assume that there are spoke holes in the Neutrons).
I don't believe there are any weight savings (if so, they're marginal) by using these tubeless tires. As I said in the post above "The weight difference between this setup and a regular tube/tire is negligible. These Hutchinson Tubeless tires weigh 290g each. A tube/tire setup is approximately 220g (tire) + 70g (tube) - depending on the tire and tube you go with." I don't think you'd go with this setup to be saving weight - I think you'd go with it to reduce punctures.
I haven't taken them off yet so I'm not sure of the mess involved. There was about 2 ounces of Stan's put in the tire, so it's not a lot, but perhaps a bit of a mess. Not sure.
I've been riding these tires for about a month now. So far so good, but I'll be writing another post about these in a few weeks to give a final review on them.
- there is very little weight saving, but a massive* saving in the number of flats you'll get. On top of that you get reduced rolling resistance because of the more supple tyre.
- when you change the tyres out, there will be a mess. Don't do it sitting inside on your brand new sofa. Do it outside. :-)
* "massive saving in punctures: in a 10 day MTB racewith a team of 4 in outback Queensland, 3 of us got about 25 punctures because of the horrible thorns everywhere. 1 of us got zero (0) punctures. Guess the 1 guy who had the tubeless tyres with Stans liquid? The rest of us had different kinds of puncture resistant and goo filled tubes - and they didn't help much.
It almost sounds like from your comment that you are considering running another tire as a tubeless setup. Don't!! They will blow off - only tires made for tubeless setup can work and right now I only know of one road tire that is tubeless: Hutchinson Fusion 2 Tubeless.
Not sure if this is what you were saying, but wanted to make sure it is clear.
Beautiful site, by the way!
The velodramatic image is probably HDR -- multiple exposures taken at different settings to dramatically increase the contrast.